head to head · open source

OpenCut vs fabric-video-editor

OpenCut has 90,995 GitHub stars, 9,002 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. fabric-video-editor has 574 stars, 169 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 15,753% (90,995 vs 574 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; fabric-video-editor is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, fabric-video-editor 29%. OpenCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 91K fabric-video-editor ★ 574 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut fabric-video-editor
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 574
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-08-30
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 169
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick fabric-video-editor if

  • You want the fabric-video-editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and fabric-video-editor fits your workflow better

full fabric-video-editor profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About fabric-video-editor

Fabric Video Editor is an open source, MIT licensed video editor that runs entirely in the browser — a timeline based tool for text, image, video and audio layers with animations, filters and export with sound — built with Fabric.js, React, Next.js, MobX, Tailwind CSS and TypeScript, and aimed at developers who want editing capability inside a web application rather than in a desktop program.

read the full fabric-video-editor overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or fabric-video-editor more popular?

OpenCut has 90,995 GitHub stars and fabric-video-editor has 574. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and fabric-video-editor free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and fabric-video-editor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and fabric-video-editor?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and fabric-video-editor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or fabric-video-editor?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,995 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fabric-video-editor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.