head to head · open source

OpenCut vs basis_universal

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars, 9,094 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. basis_universal has 3,116 stars, 347 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 2,864% (92,358 vs 3,116 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; basis_universal is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, basis_universal 11%. OpenCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 92K basis_universal ★ 3.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut basis_universal
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 3.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 347
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick basis_universal if

  • You want the basis_universal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and basis_universal fits your workflow better

full basis_universal profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About basis_universal

Basis Universal is an open source C++ GPU texture codec system that lets developers encode images, HDR content, and short animations once into a supercompressed interchange file and transcode them on demand to nearly any GPU texture format.

read the full basis_universal overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or basis_universal more popular?

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars and basis_universal has 3,116. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and basis_universal free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and basis_universal under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and basis_universal?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and basis_universal in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or basis_universal?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (92,358 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose basis_universal if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.