head to head · open source

motion vs lottie-ios

motion has 33,658 GitHub stars, 1,363 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. lottie-ios has 26,881 stars, 3,840 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. motion leads on adoption by 25% (33,658 vs 26,881 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; lottie-ios is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, lottie-ios 14%. lottie-ios was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

motion ★ 34K lottie-ios ★ 27K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

motion lottie-ios
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 27K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 3.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick motion if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full motion profile →

pick lottie-ios if

  • You want the lottie-ios feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and lottie-ios fits your workflow better

full lottie-ios profile →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

About lottie-ios

Lottie for iOS is an Apache 2.0 Swift library that natively renders After Effects and bodymovin JSON vector animations in realtime on iOS, macOS, tvOS, and visionOS, and it is aimed at Apple platform developers who want to ship designer authored motion without rebuilding it by hand in code.

read the full lottie-ios overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

motion vs ant-design motion vs open-design motion vs manim motion vs anime motion vs hyperframes motion vs daisyui motion vs tabler motion vs layui motion vs vant motion vs Figma-Context-MCP motion vs Tkinter-Designer motion vs pencil

Frequently asked questions

Is motion or lottie-ios more popular?

motion has 33,658 GitHub stars and lottie-ios has 26,881. motion has the larger community by that measure.

Are motion and lottie-ios free?

Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and lottie-ios under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between motion and lottie-ios?

motion is written in TypeScript and lottie-ios in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, motion or lottie-ios?

Choose motion if you want the larger community (33,658 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lottie-ios if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.