head to head · open source
motion vs Figma-Context-MCP
motion has 34,905 GitHub stars, 1,507 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Figma-Context-MCP has 16,157 stars, 1,275 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. motion leads on adoption by 116% (34,905 vs 16,157 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; Figma-Context-MCP is written in TypeScript under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Figma-Context-MCP 8%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| motion | Figma-Context-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 16K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick motion if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Figma-Context-MCP if
- You want the Figma-Context-MCP feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Figma-Context-MCP fits your workflow better
About motion
Motion An open source animation library for JavaScript, React and Vue Table of Contents 1. Why Motion? 2. 🍦 Platforms 3. 🎓 Examples 4. ⚡️ Motion+ 5. 👩🏻⚖️ License 6. 💎 Contribute 7. ✨ Sponsors Why Motion? Simple API: First class React, JavaScript, and Vue packages. Hybrid engine: Power of JavaScript combined with native browser APIs for 120fps, GPU accelerated animations. Production ready: TypeScript, extensive test suite, tree shakable, tiny footprint. Batteries included: Gestures, springs, layout transitions, scroll linked effects, timelines. 🍦 Platforms Motion is available for React, JavaScript and Vue…
read the full motion overview →
About Figma-Context-MCP
Framelink MCP for Figma Give your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one shot. Give Cursor and other AI powered coding tools access to your Figma files with this Model Context Protocol server. When Cursor has access to Figma design data, it's way better at one shotting designs accurately than alternative approaches like pasting screenshots. See quickstart instructions → Demo Watch a demo of building a UI in Cursor with Figma design data How it works 1. Open your IDE's chat (e.g. agent mode in Cursor). 2. Paste a link to a Figma file, frame, or group. 3. Ask Cursor to do…
read the full Figma-Context-MCP overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is motion or Figma-Context-MCP more popular?
motion has 34,905 GitHub stars and Figma-Context-MCP has 16,157. motion has the larger community by that measure.
Are motion and Figma-Context-MCP free?
Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and Figma-Context-MCP under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between motion and Figma-Context-MCP?
motion is written in TypeScript and Figma-Context-MCP in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, motion or Figma-Context-MCP?
Choose motion if you want the larger community (34,905 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Figma-Context-MCP if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.