head to head · open source

ant-design vs motion

ant-design has 99,552 GitHub stars, 54,716 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. motion has 33,658 stars, 1,363 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 196% (99,552 vs 33,658 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; motion is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, motion 4%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K motion ★ 34K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design motion
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 34K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick motion if

  • You want the motion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and motion fits your workflow better

full motion profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or motion more popular?

ant-design has 99,552 GitHub stars and motion has 33,658. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and motion free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and motion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and motion?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and motion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or motion?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,552 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose motion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.