head to head · open source

hyperframes vs motion

hyperframes has 51,695 GitHub stars, 4,712 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped today. motion has 33,658 stars, 1,363 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 54% (51,695 vs 33,658 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; motion is written in TypeScript under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, motion 4%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 52K motion ★ 34K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes motion
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 34K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick motion if

  • You want the motion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and motion fits your workflow better

full motion profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs Figma-Context-MCP hyperframes vs Tkinter-Designer hyperframes vs pencil

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or motion more popular?

hyperframes has 51,695 GitHub stars and motion has 33,658. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and motion free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and motion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and motion?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and motion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or motion?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (51,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose motion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.