head to head · open source

motion vs mojs

motion has 33,670 GitHub stars, 1,364 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. mojs has 18,778 stars, 888 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. motion leads on adoption by 79% (33,670 vs 18,778 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; mojs is written in CoffeeScript under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, mojs 5%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (animation, motion), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

motion ★ 34K mojs ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

motion mojs
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 19K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript CoffeeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-07-30
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 888
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick motion if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full motion profile →

pick mojs if

  • You want the mojs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CoffeeScript
  • You evaluated both and mojs fits your workflow better

full mojs profile →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

About mojs

mojs is a JavaScript motion graphics library, published on the npm registry as @mojs/core , that gives web developers a declarative API and built in components for animating HTML, shapes, swirls, bursts and staggers on the web.

read the full mojs overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

motion vs ant-design motion vs open-design motion vs manim motion vs anime motion vs hyperframes motion vs daisyui motion vs tabler motion vs layui motion vs lottie-ios motion vs vant motion vs primitives motion vs Figma-Context-MCP

Frequently asked questions

Is motion or mojs more popular?

motion has 33,670 GitHub stars and mojs has 18,778. motion has the larger community by that measure.

Are motion and mojs free?

Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and mojs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between motion and mojs?

motion is written in TypeScript and mojs in CoffeeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, motion or mojs?

Choose motion if you want the larger community (33,670 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mojs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.