head to head · open source

Invidious vs songloft

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. songloft has 1,746 stars, 143 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Invidious leads on adoption by 1,301% (24,469 vs 1,746 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; songloft is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, songloft 8%. songloft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K songloft ★ 1.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious songloft
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.7K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Crystal Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick songloft if

  • You want the songloft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and songloft fits your workflow better

full songloft profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About songloft

Songloft is a self hosted music server written in Go under Apache 2.0. It manages music files the user already owns and provides no built in copyrighted content. The project was renamed from MiMusic at version 2.0, with old GitHub and Docker paths kept as redirects for at least one year.

read the full songloft overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or songloft more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and songloft has 1,746. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and songloft free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and songloft under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and songloft?

Invidious is written in Crystal and songloft in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or songloft?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose songloft if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.