head to head · open source
Invidious vs rtp2httpd
Invidious has 25,830 GitHub stars, 2,896 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rtp2httpd has 2,308 stars, 374 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 1,019% (25,830 vs 2,308 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; rtp2httpd is written in C under GPL-2.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, rtp2httpd 16%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Invidious | rtp2httpd | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Crystal | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 374 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Invidious if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Crystal
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rtp2httpd if
- You want the rtp2httpd feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and rtp2httpd fits your workflow better
About Invidious
Invidious An open source alternative front end to YouTube Website • Instances list • FAQ • Documentation • Contribute • Donate Chat with us: Screenshots Features User features Lightweight No ads No tracking No JavaScript required Light/Dark themes Customizable homepage Subscriptions independent from Google Notifications for all subscribed channels Audio only mode (with background play on mobile) Support for Reddit comments Available in many languages, thanks to our translators Data import/export Import subscriptions from YouTube, NewPipe and FreeTube Import watch history from YouTube and NewPipe Export…
read the full Invidious overview →
About rtp2httpd
rtp2httpd IPTV 流媒体转发服务器 访问官方文档网站 English Documentation HTTP ：将组播 RTP/UDP 流转换为标准 HTTP 流 RTSP HTTP ：RTSP 转为 HTTP 视频流，完整支持 RTSP/RTP 协议栈，支持 UDP NAT 穿透 (STUN) 可以实现 IPTV RTSP 时移源的回看 HTTP HTTP ：实现了完整反向代理，可以将 IPTV 内网 HLS 源代理到局域网、公网，方便观看 udpxy 兼容性 ：完全兼容 udpxy URL 格式 M3U 播放列表集成 ：支持 M3U/M3U8 格式，自动识别并转换节目地址，提供标准化的播放列表 支持外部 M3U URL 智能识别 RTP/RTSP URL 并转换为 HTTP 代理格式 自动处理 catchup source 时移回看地址 通过 http:// /playlist.m3u 访问转换后的播放列表 抗丢包抗抖动 ：支持乱序恢复、FEC 前向纠错技术，保证播放质量 自动纠正乱序到达的 RTP 包，消除网络抖动导致的花屏 支持 Reed Solomon FEC 冗余恢复，可抵抗轻度丢包（需组播上游支持 FEC） 频道快照 ：支持通过 HTTP 请求快速获取频道的快照图片，降低播放端解码压力 ⚡ FCC 快速换台技术 支持运营商 FCC 协议 ：搭配运营商 FCC 服务器，实现毫秒级换台响应，媲美原生…
read the full rtp2httpd overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Media & Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Invidious or rtp2httpd more popular?
Invidious has 25,830 GitHub stars and rtp2httpd has 2,308. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.
Are Invidious and rtp2httpd free?
Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rtp2httpd under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Invidious and rtp2httpd?
Invidious is written in Crystal and rtp2httpd in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Invidious or rtp2httpd?
Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (25,830 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rtp2httpd if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.