head to head · open source
Invidious vs nota
Invidious has 26,007 GitHub stars, 2,912 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nota has 524 stars, 44 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Invidious leads on adoption by 4,863% (26,007 vs 524 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; nota is written in C# under AGPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, nota 8%. nota was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Invidious | nota | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 524 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Crystal | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Invidious if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Crystal
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nota if
- You want the nota feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and nota fits your workflow better
About Invidious
Invidious An open source alternative front end to YouTube Website • Instances list • FAQ • Documentation • Contribute • Donate Chat with us: Screenshots Features User features Lightweight No ads No tracking No JavaScript required Light/Dark themes Customizable homepage Subscriptions independent from Google Notifications for all subscribed channels Audio only mode (with background play on mobile) Support for Reddit comments Available in many languages, thanks to our translators Data import/export Import subscriptions from YouTube, NewPipe and FreeTube Import watch history from YouTube and NewPipe Export…
read the full Invidious overview →
About nota
Nota A free music studio for macOS, Windows and Linux. No subscription, no account, no feature tiers — just open it and make music. ▶ Watch the demo with sound (1:45, YouTube) Why Nota Free, for good. Open source, no paid edition, no "upgrade to unlock". Arrange and jam. A linear Arrangement timeline and a clip launching Session grid, with material moving freely between them — plus a Modular view for patching modulation by cable. A full kit out of the box. 35 built in instruments and effects: subtractive, wavetable, FM, granular and physical modelling synths, a drum machine, EQ, compressors, reverbs, delays…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Media & Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Invidious or nota more popular?
Invidious has 26,007 GitHub stars and nota has 524. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.
Are Invidious and nota free?
Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nota under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Invidious and nota?
Invidious is written in Crystal and nota in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Invidious or nota?
Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (26,007 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nota if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.