head to head · open source

Invidious vs MovieBox-Tui

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. MovieBox-Tui has 2,029 stars, 216 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 1,106% (24,469 vs 2,029 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; MovieBox-Tui is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, MovieBox-Tui 11%. MovieBox-Tui was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K MovieBox-Tui ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious MovieBox-Tui
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.0K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Crystal Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 216
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick MovieBox-Tui if

  • You want the MovieBox-Tui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and MovieBox-Tui fits your workflow better

full MovieBox-Tui profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About MovieBox-Tui

MovieBox Tui is a Rust terminal user interface for finding, downloading, and streaming movies, TV shows, anime, and live television. It lives in the command line media ecosystem, using ratatui and local players such as mpv, IINA, VLC, or Android video players. The project gives users one keyboard driven workspace for searching titles, browsing providers, importing IPTV playlists, and launching playback.

read the full MovieBox-Tui overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or MovieBox-Tui more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and MovieBox-Tui has 2,029. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and MovieBox-Tui free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and MovieBox-Tui under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and MovieBox-Tui?

Invidious is written in Crystal and MovieBox-Tui in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or MovieBox-Tui?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose MovieBox-Tui if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.