head to head · open source

Invidious vs iptv-tool

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. iptv-tool has 1,116 stars, 295 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 2,093% (24,469 vs 1,116 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; iptv-tool is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, iptv-tool 26%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K iptv-tool ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious iptv-tool
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.1K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Crystal PHP
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-08-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 295
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick iptv-tool if

  • You want the iptv-tool feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and iptv-tool fits your workflow better

full iptv-tool profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About iptv-tool

iptv tool is a self hosted IPTV toolbox written in PHP and distributed under the GPL 2.0 licence. It runs from a Docker image (taksss/php epg) built on Alpine, with images published for the amd64, arm64 and armv7 architectures and a compressed image size of about 20 MB. The project manages Electronic Program Guide data, live source lists and channel logos from a single web administration page, and it returns data in the DIYP/Baichuan, 超级直播 and xmltv formats.

read the full iptv-tool overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or iptv-tool more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and iptv-tool has 1,116. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and iptv-tool free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and iptv-tool under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and iptv-tool?

Invidious is written in Crystal and iptv-tool in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or iptv-tool?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose iptv-tool if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.