head to head · open source

Invidious vs ffmpeg-webCLI

Invidious has 24,481 GitHub stars, 2,750 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ffmpeg-webCLI has 1,429 stars, 131 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 1,613% (24,481 vs 1,429 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; ffmpeg-webCLI is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ffmpeg-webCLI 9%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K ffmpeg-webCLI ★ 1.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious ffmpeg-webCLI
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.4K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Crystal JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 131
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick ffmpeg-webCLI if

  • You want the ffmpeg-webCLI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and ffmpeg-webCLI fits your workflow better

full ffmpeg-webCLI profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About ffmpeg-webCLI

ffmpeg webCLI is a browser based video and audio editor built on ffmpeg.wasm that runs every operation locally in the browser, aimed at anyone who needs to convert, trim, compress, caption, or extract media without uploading files to a server.

read the full ffmpeg-webCLI overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or ffmpeg-webCLI more popular?

Invidious has 24,481 GitHub stars and ffmpeg-webCLI has 1,429. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and ffmpeg-webCLI free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ffmpeg-webCLI under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and ffmpeg-webCLI?

Invidious is written in Crystal and ffmpeg-webCLI in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or ffmpeg-webCLI?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,481 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ffmpeg-webCLI if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.