head to head · open source

Invidious vs ComeCut

Invidious has 24,481 GitHub stars, 2,750 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ComeCut has 591 stars, 76 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 4,042% (24,481 vs 591 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; ComeCut is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ComeCut 13%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K ComeCut ★ 591 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious ComeCut
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 591
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Crystal HTML
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 76
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick ComeCut if

  • You want the ComeCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and ComeCut fits your workflow better

full ComeCut profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About ComeCut

ComeCut (「来剪」) is a free, lightweight, AI assisted video editing suite that runs in the browser and as a Windows desktop application, built for creators who want a CapCut like editor without accounts, fees, or cloud uploads.

read the full ComeCut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or ComeCut more popular?

Invidious has 24,481 GitHub stars and ComeCut has 591. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and ComeCut free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ComeCut under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and ComeCut?

Invidious is written in Crystal and ComeCut in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or ComeCut?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,481 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ComeCut if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.