head to head · open source

Invidious vs BookWyrm

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. BookWyrm has 2,779 stars, 336 forks, 418 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Invidious leads on adoption by 780% (24,469 vs 2,779 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; BookWyrm is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, BookWyrm 12%. BookWyrm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K BookWyrm ★ 2.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious BookWyrm
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Crystal Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 336
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick BookWyrm if

  • You want the BookWyrm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and BookWyrm fits your workflow better

full BookWyrm profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About BookWyrm

BookWyrm is a social reading network for tracking books, writing reviews, and discovering what to read next. It lives in the ActivityPub ecosystem, so users can interact with other BookWyrm instances and with ActivityPub services such as Mastodon and Pleroma. The project is a Python web application using Django, PostgreSQL, Redis, Celery, and ActivityPub.

read the full BookWyrm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or BookWyrm more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and BookWyrm has 2,779. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and BookWyrm free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and BookWyrm has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Invidious and BookWyrm?

Invidious is written in Crystal and BookWyrm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or BookWyrm?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose BookWyrm if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.