head to head · open source

integration vs UI

integration has 7,869 GitHub stars, 1,613 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. UI has 2,081 stars, 422 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 278% (7,869 vs 2,081 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; UI is written in JavaScript under MIT. integration has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, UI 20%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (hacs, home-assistant, integration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.9K UI ★ 2.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration UI
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 2.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 422
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick UI if

  • You want the UI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and UI fits your workflow better

full UI profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…

read the full integration overview →

About UI

UI Lovelace Minimalist [!IMPORTANT] Looking for New Maintainers! This project is in need of new maintainers! The current maintainers are no longer actively working on it, and without fresh leadership, we may be forced to shut down the project and its associated Discord server. If you're passionate about this project and would like to take over its development and community management, we’d love to hear from you! Join us on Discord to discuss further: Thread Message Or reach out on GitHub Discussions: GitHub discussion Thank you for considering helping keep this project alive and thriving! 🙌 It's kind of hard to…

read the full UI overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or UI more popular?

integration has 7,869 GitHub stars and UI has 2,081. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and UI free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and UI under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and UI?

integration is written in Python and UI in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or UI?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,869 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose UI if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.