head to head · open source

integration vs frontend

integration has 7,776 GitHub stars, 1,595 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. frontend has 5,693 stars, 3,860 forks, 383 open issues and last shipped today. integration leads on adoption by 37% (7,776 vs 5,693 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; frontend is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, frontend 68%. frontend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.8K frontend ★ 5.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration frontend
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 5.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 3.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick frontend if

  • You want the frontend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and frontend fits your workflow better

full frontend profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About frontend

The Home Assistant Frontend is the official web interface for Home Assistant, built for home automation users and developers who want a browser based control panel for their smart home.

read the full frontend overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs lovelace-mushroom integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or frontend more popular?

integration has 7,776 GitHub stars and frontend has 5,693. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and frontend free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and frontend under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and frontend?

integration is written in Python and frontend in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or frontend?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,776 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose frontend if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.