head to head · open source

oomwoo vs integration

oomwoo has 11,109 GitHub stars, 695 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration has 7,738 stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oomwoo leads on adoption by 44% (11,109 vs 7,738 stars). oomwoo is written in Python under Apache-2.0; integration is written in Python under MIT. oomwoo has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, integration 21%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

oomwoo ★ 11K integration ★ 7.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

oomwoo integration
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 7.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 695 ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick oomwoo if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full oomwoo profile →

pick integration if

  • You want the integration feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and integration fits your workflow better

full integration profile →

About oomwoo

OOMWOO is an open source robot vacuum cleaner that you build yourself from a Raspberry Pi CM4 or CM5, 3D printed parts, Arduino and ESP32 electronics, and ROS2 software, aimed at makers and Home Assistant users who want a local, cloud free cleaning robot they can hack, repair, and extend.

read the full oomwoo overview →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

oomwoo vs Home Assistant oomwoo vs frigate oomwoo vs homebridge oomwoo vs espectre oomwoo vs hass-xiaomi-miot oomwoo vs CrateDB oomwoo vs python-miio oomwoo vs OpenMQTTGateway oomwoo vs android oomwoo vs domoticz oomwoo vs IRremoteESP8266 oomwoo vs linux-android

Frequently asked questions

Is oomwoo or integration more popular?

oomwoo has 11,109 GitHub stars and integration has 7,738. oomwoo has the larger community by that measure.

Are oomwoo and integration free?

Both are open source. oomwoo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and integration under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between oomwoo and integration?

oomwoo is written in Python and integration in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, oomwoo or integration?

Choose oomwoo if you want the larger community (11,109 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose integration if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.