head to head · open source

integration vs OpenMQTTGateway

integration has 7,738 GitHub stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenMQTTGateway has 4,096 stars, 906 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 89% (7,738 vs 4,096 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; OpenMQTTGateway is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, OpenMQTTGateway 22%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K OpenMQTTGateway ★ 4.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration OpenMQTTGateway
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 4.1K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 906
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick OpenMQTTGateway if

  • You want the OpenMQTTGateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and OpenMQTTGateway fits your workflow better

full OpenMQTTGateway profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About OpenMQTTGateway

OpenMQTTGateway is an open source C++ gateway firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 boards that connects local radio and sensor protocols to MQTT. It lives in the home automation ecosystem and is associated with Home Assistant, OpenHAB, NodeRed, and AWS IOT. The project aims to unify various technologies and protocols into a single firmware, reducing the need for multiple physical bridges.

read the full OpenMQTTGateway overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs android integration vs domoticz integration vs IRremoteESP8266 integration vs linux-android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or OpenMQTTGateway more popular?

integration has 7,738 GitHub stars and OpenMQTTGateway has 4,096. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and OpenMQTTGateway free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and OpenMQTTGateway under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and OpenMQTTGateway?

integration is written in Python and OpenMQTTGateway in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or OpenMQTTGateway?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,738 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenMQTTGateway if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.