head to head · open source

ImageToolbox vs Krita

ImageToolbox has 14,689 GitHub stars, 637 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Krita has 10,393 stars, 859 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. ImageToolbox leads on adoption by 41% (14,689 vs 10,393 stars). ImageToolbox is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0; Krita is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. ImageToolbox has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Krita 8%. Krita was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ImageToolbox ★ 15K Krita ★ 10K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ImageToolbox Krita
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Kotlin C++
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 637 ⑂ 859
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ImageToolbox if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ImageToolbox profile →

pick Krita if

  • You want the Krita feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Krita fits your workflow better

full Krita profile →

About ImageToolbox

ImageToolbox is a free and open source Android image editor written in Kotlin with Jetpack Compose and released under Apache 2.0, aimed at photographers, developers, and everyday Android users who need deep photo manipulation — crop, draw, filter chains, EXIF editing, background removal, and AI assisted enhancement — without analytics or crash reporting dependencies.

read the full ImageToolbox overview →

About Krita

Krita is a free and open source cross platform application for digital painting. It lives in the KDE ecosystem and is built on the KDE and Qt frameworks. The project is licensed under the GNU Public License, Version 3, and the GitHub repository is a mirror of the real code repository at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita.git.

read the full Krita overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

ImageToolbox vs OpenCut ImageToolbox vs LosslessCut ImageToolbox vs sharp ImageToolbox vs rembg ImageToolbox vs Audacity ImageToolbox vs filepond ImageToolbox vs Shotcut ImageToolbox vs palmier-pro ImageToolbox vs Darktable ImageToolbox vs libvips ImageToolbox vs imgproxy ImageToolbox vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is ImageToolbox or Krita more popular?

ImageToolbox has 14,689 GitHub stars and Krita has 10,393. ImageToolbox has the larger community by that measure.

Are ImageToolbox and Krita free?

Both are open source. ImageToolbox is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Krita under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ImageToolbox and Krita?

ImageToolbox is written in Kotlin and Krita in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ImageToolbox or Krita?

Choose ImageToolbox if you want the larger community (14,689 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Krita if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.