head to head · open source

filmcraft vs ai-video-editor

filmcraft has 17,780 GitHub stars, 7,302 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ai-video-editor has 949 stars, 126 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filmcraft leads on adoption by 1,774% (17,780 vs 949 stars). filmcraft is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; ai-video-editor is written in JavaScript under MIT. filmcraft has attracted 41% as many forks as stars, ai-video-editor 13%. filmcraft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filmcraft ★ 18K ai-video-editor ★ 949 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

filmcraft ai-video-editor
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 949
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-08 2026-11-08
Forks ⑂ 7.3K ⑂ 126
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filmcraft if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filmcraft profile →

pick ai-video-editor if

  • You want the ai-video-editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and ai-video-editor fits your workflow better

full ai-video-editor profile →

About filmcraft

FilmCraft Video editing, color and sound; an open source, clean room reimplementation of Adobe Premiere Pro, rebuilt in pure Rust. An open source, clean room take on the Adobe Premiere Pro workflow: native on macOS, Windows and Linux, and in the browser via WebAssembly. By the ArtCraft team. FilmCraft on getartcraft.com · ArtCraft · All Crafting Apps Apollo 11 Tranquility : a three minute documentary edit of NASA's 1969 launch, landing and moonwalk film, with subtitles from the mission transcript. Every frame in these screenshots comes from public domain footage, decoded, composited and graded by FilmCraft's own…

read the full filmcraft overview →

About ai-video-editor

Timeline Studio — Browser AI Video Editor English 中文 日本語 한국어 Español Français Deutsch Português ไทย Tiếng Việt Русский Responsible use of deep synthesis This tool uses deep synthesis technology and is intended solely for technical research and learning. Users must ensure that they: use only facial images or videos of themselves or people who have provided lawful authorization; do not create or distribute any illegal, infringing, false, or misleading content; do not present generated content as authentic footage or impersonate another person without their consent. Users are solely responsible for any legal…

read the full ai-video-editor overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Frequently asked questions

Is filmcraft or ai-video-editor more popular?

filmcraft has 17,780 GitHub stars and ai-video-editor has 949. filmcraft has the larger community by that measure.

Are filmcraft and ai-video-editor free?

Both are open source. filmcraft is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ai-video-editor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filmcraft and ai-video-editor?

filmcraft is written in Rust and ai-video-editor in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filmcraft or ai-video-editor?

Choose filmcraft if you want the larger community (17,780 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ai-video-editor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.