head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs reviewboard
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. reviewboard has 1,729 stars, 436 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 1,783% (32,563 vs 1,729 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; reviewboard is written in Python under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, reviewboard 25%. reviewboard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | reviewboard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 436 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewboard if
- You want the reviewboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and reviewboard fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About reviewboard
Review Board ============ Review Board is an open source, web based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low. We began writing Review Board in 2006 to fill a hole in the code review market. We wanted something open source that could be flexible enough to work with a variety of workflows, and could take the pain out of the code review process. Today, it's a vital part of the development process at thousands of projects and companies, ranging from small startups of two people to enterprises of thousands…
read the full reviewboard overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or reviewboard more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and reviewboard has 1,729. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and reviewboard free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and reviewboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and reviewboard?
code-review-graph is written in Python and reviewboard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or reviewboard?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.