head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs reviewboard
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. reviewboard has 1,724 stars, 438 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 1,730% (31,548 vs 1,724 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; reviewboard is written in Python under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, reviewboard 25%. reviewboard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | reviewboard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 438 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewboard if
- You want the reviewboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and reviewboard fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About reviewboard
Review Board open source web based code document review tool. Python language. MIT license. Developer tools category. Version control collaboration category. Homepage reviewboard.org. GitHub metadata: 1727 stars. 438 forks. 0 open issues. Repo age 17 years. Last push 2026 09 10T19:23:42Z. Helps companies open source projects organizations keep quality high bug count low. Began 2006 fill hole code review market. Wanted open source flexible enough variety workflows. Wanted take pain out code review process. Today used by thousands projects companies. Small startups two people. Enterprises thousands.…
read the full reviewboard overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or reviewboard more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars and reviewboard has 1,724. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and reviewboard free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and reviewboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and reviewboard?
code-review-graph is written in Python and reviewboard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or reviewboard?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,548 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.