head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs mantis
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. mantis has 2,695 stars, 224 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 1,108% (32,563 vs 2,695 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; mantis is written in Python under Apache-2.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mantis 8%. mantis was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | mantis | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 224 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mantis if
- You want the mantis feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and mantis fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About mantis
Mantis: Portable Toolkit for Building Secure Software [!CAUTION] USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. BE EXTREMELY CAREFUL. This suite is designed to generate and execute autonomously generated code that may be unstable or perform unexpected actions. USE THIS ONLY IN ISOLATED, RESTRICTED ENVIRONMENTS. Never run this suite on a machine with access to production systems, sensitive data, or internal networks. [!IMPORTANT] RESPONSIBLE USE AI models are non deterministic and can hallucinate findings or generate incorrect patches. All findings must be manually verified by a security expert before being reported. Do not mass file…
read the full mantis overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or mantis more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and mantis has 2,695. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and mantis free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and mantis under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and mantis?
code-review-graph is written in Python and mantis in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or mantis?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mantis if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.