head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs gentle-shell
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gentle-shell has 902 stars, 127 forks, 369 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 3,399% (31,557 vs 902 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; gentle-shell is written in TypeScript under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gentle-shell 14%. gentle-shell was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-coding, code-review, llm, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | gentle-shell | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 902 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 127 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gentle-shell if
- You want the gentle-shell feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and gentle-shell fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About gentle-shell
gentle shell™ Your coding agent for controlled development in the workspace you lead. Website · Quickstart · Docs · Wiki Your terminal can run an agent. Your workspace should help you lead it. gentle shell is your coding agent, bringing your changes, tasks, and engineering workflow together—built for Pi. One workspace. A coding agent you direct. A workflow you can inspect. BUILT FOR PI · Coding agent workspace · Focused agents · ODD + optional SDD ★ Star gentle shell on GitHub Built for Pi. Shaped by Gentle AI. Features gentle shell — Your coding agent, in the workspace you lead A complete workspace for the agent…
read the full gentle-shell overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or gentle-shell more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars and gentle-shell has 902. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and gentle-shell free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and gentle-shell under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and gentle-shell?
code-review-graph is written in Python and gentle-shell in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or gentle-shell?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,557 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gentle-shell if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.