head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs Forgejo
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Forgejo has 0 stars, 0 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped —. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 0% (31,548 vs 0 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; Forgejo is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Forgejo 0%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | Forgejo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 0 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 0 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Forgejo if
- You want the Forgejo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You evaluated both and Forgejo fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About Forgejo
Forgejo is a self hosted Git forge — a lightweight and secure server for hosting Git repositories and collaborating on them — for individuals and teams who want version control infrastructure they control themselves.
read the full Forgejo overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or Forgejo more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars and Forgejo has 0. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and Forgejo free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT, and Forgejo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and Forgejo?
code-review-graph is written in Python and Forgejo in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or Forgejo?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,548 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Forgejo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.