head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs Forgejo
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Forgejo has 0 stars, 0 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped —. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 0% (32,563 vs 0 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; Forgejo is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Forgejo 0%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | Forgejo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 0 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | — |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 0 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Forgejo if
- You want the Forgejo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You evaluated both and Forgejo fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About Forgejo
read the full Forgejo overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or Forgejo more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and Forgejo has 0. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and Forgejo free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT, and Forgejo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and Forgejo?
code-review-graph is written in Python and Forgejo in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or Forgejo?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Forgejo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.