head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs flock
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flock has 506 stars, 5 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 6,137% (31,557 vs 506 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; flock is written in Go under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, flock 1%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (claude, claude-code, code-review, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | flock | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 506 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 5 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flock if
- You want the flock feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and flock fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About flock
English · Русский · 中文 · Español · Deutsch · Français · Português (BR) · 日本語 Flock Run a Claude Code AI dev team on your server and drive it from chat. Describe a feature in Telegram, VK or LO; the team plans it, builds it on a branch, tests it, reviews it, and opens a PR — each chat in its own isolated workspace. It runs on your Claude Pro/Max subscription (no per token billing) or an Anthropic API key, ships as prebuilt Docker images (no build step), and keeps every chat in its own sandboxed workspace. Quick start (Docker) That pulls the prebuilt image ghcr.io/duckbugio/flock telegram — no build, no Ansible — t…
read the full flock overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or flock more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars and flock has 506. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and flock free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and flock under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and flock?
code-review-graph is written in Python and flock in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or flock?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,557 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flock if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.