head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs claude-code-skills
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-code-skills has 565 stars, 84 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 5,485% (31,557 vs 565 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; claude-code-skills is written in PowerShell under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, claude-code-skills 15%. code-review-graph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | claude-code-skills | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 565 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | PowerShell |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 84 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-code-skills if
- You want the claude-code-skills feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PowerShell
- You evaluated both and claude-code-skills fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About claude-code-skills
Claude Codex Skills Give your AI agent a clear finish line. You ask for a fix and get a new abstraction. A review lists generic advice. The agent says “done,” but you still have to work out what it checked. These skills give Claude Code and Codex a concrete way to finish the task: establish the intended outcome, work within scope, verify the result, and make remaining gaps explicit. Choose the skill for the problem in front of you. Project page · Install · Full catalog What changes in your workflow A clearer target. Turn an idea, bug report, or incident into an outcome the agent can check. Focused work. Reuse exi…
read the full claude-code-skills overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or claude-code-skills more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,557 GitHub stars and claude-code-skills has 565. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and claude-code-skills free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and claude-code-skills under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and claude-code-skills?
code-review-graph is written in Python and claude-code-skills in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or claude-code-skills?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,557 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose claude-code-skills if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.