head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs ess-helm

AutoMQ has 10,830 GitHub stars, 774 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ess-helm has 957 stars, 145 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 1,032% (10,830 vs 957 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ess-helm is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ess-helm 15%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K ess-helm ★ 957 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ ess-helm
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 957
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 774 ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick ess-helm if

  • You want the ess-helm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ess-helm fits your workflow better

full ess-helm profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About ess-helm

ess helm is the official Element Matrix stack packaged as Helm charts — Element Server Suite Community Edition (ESS Community) — and it is aimed at non commercial community operators who want a solid Matrix deployment on Kubernetes without deep Kubernetes knowledge.

read the full ess-helm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kafka vs automq kafka vs nats-server kafka vs webrtc kafka vs soketi nats-server vs webrtc kafka vs madelineproto kafka vs dino kafka vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs kafka AutoMQ vs nats-server AutoMQ vs webrtc AutoMQ vs Soketi AutoMQ vs MadelineProto AutoMQ vs dino AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs SIP.js AutoMQ vs routr AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or ess-helm more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,830 GitHub stars and ess-helm has 957. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and ess-helm free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ess-helm under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and ess-helm?

AutoMQ is written in Java and ess-helm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or ess-helm?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,830 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ess-helm if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.