head to head · open source

Audacity vs OpenShot

Audacity has 18,465 GitHub stars, 2,671 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenShot has 6,512 stars, 808 forks, 418 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 184% (18,465 vs 6,512 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; OpenShot is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, OpenShot 12%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 18K OpenShot ★ 6.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity OpenShot
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 6.5K
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in C++ Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 808
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick OpenShot if

  • You want the OpenShot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and OpenShot fits your workflow better

full OpenShot profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About OpenShot

OpenShot Video Editor is a free, cross platform, open source video editor for Linux, Mac, and Windows, built for hobbyists, educators, and small production teams who want timeline based editing and animation without a commercial subscription.

read the full OpenShot overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs openshot opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs Krita Audacity vs GIMP Audacity vs Kdenlive Audacity vs RawTherapee

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or OpenShot more popular?

Audacity has 18,465 GitHub stars and OpenShot has 6,512. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and OpenShot free?

Neither Audacity nor OpenShot declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and OpenShot?

Audacity is written in C++ and OpenShot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or OpenShot?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,465 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose OpenShot if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.