head to head · open source

zinx vs panel

zinx has 7,759 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. panel has 755 stars, 62 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zinx leads on adoption by 928% (7,759 vs 755 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; panel is written in TypeScript under MIT. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, panel 8%. panel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K panel ★ 755 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx panel
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 755
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-10-06
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick panel if

  • You want the panel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and panel fits your workflow better

full panel profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About panel

Calagopus Panel is a self hosted game server management panel for Minecraft, Rust, and similar titles, rewritten from the ground up in Rust as a modern alternative to Pterodactyl and Pelican.

read the full panel overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs OpenRA zinx vs engine zinx vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or panel more popular?

zinx has 7,759 GitHub stars and panel has 755. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and panel free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and panel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and panel?

zinx is written in Go and panel in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or panel?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,759 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose panel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.