head to head · open source

Timeplus vs Workbench

Timeplus has 2,260 GitHub stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Workbench has 442 stars, 43 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Timeplus leads on adoption by 411% (2,260 vs 442 stars). Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; Workbench is written in TypeScript under MIT. Timeplus has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Workbench 10%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Timeplus ★ 2.3K Workbench ★ 442 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Timeplus Workbench
GitHub stars ★ 2.3K ★ 442
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-01
Forks ⑂ 112 ⑂ 43
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Timeplus if

  • You weight community size — 2.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Timeplus profile →

pick Workbench if

  • You want the Workbench feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Workbench fits your workflow better

full Workbench profile →

About Timeplus

Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.

read the full Timeplus overview →

About Workbench

Workbench is an open source, MIT licensed dashboard for BullMQ that lets Node.js and Bun teams inspect, debug, and replay Redis backed job queues from inside their own backend, behind their own authentication.

read the full Workbench overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs timeplus automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus automq vs soketi automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Timeplus vs AutoMQ Timeplus vs Soketi Timeplus vs Sequin Timeplus vs Trench Timeplus vs Hook0 Timeplus vs Operational

Frequently asked questions

Is Timeplus or Workbench more popular?

Timeplus has 2,260 GitHub stars and Workbench has 442. Timeplus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Timeplus and Workbench free?

Both are open source. Timeplus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Workbench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Timeplus and Workbench?

Timeplus is written in C++ and Workbench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Timeplus or Workbench?

Choose Timeplus if you want the larger community (2,260 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Workbench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.