head to head · open source
Timeplus vs Workbench
Timeplus has 2,280 GitHub stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Workbench has 454 stars, 47 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Timeplus leads on adoption by 402% (2,280 vs 454 stars). Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; Workbench is written in TypeScript under MIT. Timeplus has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Workbench 10%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Timeplus | Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.3K | ★ 454 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-06-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 112 | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Timeplus if
- You weight community size — 2.3K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Workbench if
- You want the Workbench feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Workbench fits your workflow better
About Timeplus
Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…
read the full Timeplus overview →
About Workbench
Workbench Open source BullMQ dashboard. Drop in for any Node or Bun backend. Workbench is a modern dashboard for BullMQ. Runs jobs, flows, schedulers and metrics, all served from your own backend behind your own auth. Zero infrastructure — mounts as a route in your existing app, or run as a standalone Docker container Adapters for Hono, Elysia, Express, Fastify, Koa, NestJS, AdonisJS, Next.js, TanStack Start, Astro, Nuxt, Bun.serve, and h3 Standalone image on GHCR ( ghcr.io/ /workbench standalone ) for Docker / Kubernetes deployments MCP server for Cursor, Claude Desktop, Zed, and Continue.dev — drive your…
read the full Workbench overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Timeplus or Workbench more popular?
Timeplus has 2,280 GitHub stars and Workbench has 454. Timeplus has the larger community by that measure.
Are Timeplus and Workbench free?
Both are open source. Timeplus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Workbench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Timeplus and Workbench?
Timeplus is written in C++ and Workbench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Timeplus or Workbench?
Choose Timeplus if you want the larger community (2,280 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Workbench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.