head to head · open source

Sequin vs Trench

Sequin has 2,203 GitHub stars, 149 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Trench has 1,663 stars, 64 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Sequin leads on adoption by 32% (2,203 vs 1,663 stars). Sequin is written in Elixir under MIT; Trench is written in TypeScript under MIT. Sequin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Trench 4%. Trench was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kafka), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sequin ★ 2.2K Trench ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sequin Trench
GitHub stars ★ 2.2K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Elixir TypeScript
Last push 2026-02-23 2026-04-06
Forks ⑂ 149 ⑂ 64
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sequin if

  • You weight community size — 2.2K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sequin profile →

pick Trench if

  • You want the Trench feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Trench fits your workflow better

full Trench profile →

About Sequin

Sequin is an open source change data capture platform for Postgres. It lives in the Postgres ecosystem and reads database changes, then sends those changes to streams, queues, search indexes, and other endpoints. The project is written in Elixir and released under the MIT license.

read the full Sequin overview →

About Trench

Trench is an open source analytics infrastructure project written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It is built around Apache Kafka, ClickHouse, and a Node.js based service, and it is distributed as a single production ready Docker image for event tracking. The project sits in the open source event streaming and analytics ecosystem, where teams collect product events, query them quickly, and connect data to dashboards, LLM retrieval pipelines, observability tools, or other analytics products.

read the full Trench overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Sequin vs AutoMQ Sequin vs Soketi Sequin vs Timeplus Sequin vs Hook0 Sequin vs Operational Sequin vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is Sequin or Trench more popular?

Sequin has 2,203 GitHub stars and Trench has 1,663. Sequin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sequin and Trench free?

Both are open source. Sequin is licensed under MIT and Trench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Sequin and Trench?

Sequin is written in Elixir and Trench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sequin or Trench?

Choose Sequin if you want the larger community (2,203 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Trench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.