head to head · open source

Soketi vs Sequin

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. Sequin has 2,203 stars, 149 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 156% (5,634 vs 2,203 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Sequin is written in Elixir under MIT. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Sequin 7%. Sequin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Soketi ★ 5.6K Sequin ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Soketi Sequin
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 2.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Elixir
Last push 2025-03-03 2026-02-23
Forks ⑂ 363 ⑂ 149
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Soketi if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Soketi profile →

pick Sequin if

  • You want the Sequin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You evaluated both and Sequin fits your workflow better

full Sequin profile →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

About Sequin

Sequin is an open source change data capture platform for Postgres. It lives in the Postgres ecosystem and reads database changes, then sends those changes to streams, queues, search indexes, and other endpoints. The project is written in Elixir and released under the MIT license.

read the full Sequin overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs sequin soketi vs timeplus automq vs timeplus automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Soketi vs AutoMQ Soketi vs Timeplus Soketi vs Trench Soketi vs Hook0 Soketi vs Operational Soketi vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is Soketi or Sequin more popular?

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars and Sequin has 2,203. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Soketi and Sequin free?

Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sequin under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Soketi and Sequin?

Soketi is written in TypeScript and Sequin in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Soketi or Sequin?

Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,634 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Sequin if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.