head to head · open source

Pumpkin vs pinus

Pumpkin has 11,347 GitHub stars, 822 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pinus has 1,932 stars, 392 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Pumpkin leads on adoption by 487% (11,347 vs 1,932 stars). Pumpkin is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; pinus is written in JavaScript under MIT. Pumpkin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, pinus 20%. Pumpkin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pumpkin ★ 11K pinus ★ 1.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pumpkin pinus
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 1.9K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Rust JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 822 ⑂ 392
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pumpkin if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pumpkin profile →

pick pinus if

  • You want the pinus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pinus fits your workflow better

full pinus profile →

About Pumpkin

Pumpkin is a Minecraft server implementation written entirely in Rust that aims to let anyone host fast and efficient Java and Bedrock Edition servers, and it is built for server operators and plugin developers who want vanilla compatible gameplay without the official Java server.

read the full Pumpkin overview →

About pinus

Pinus is a fast, scalable, distributed game server framework for Node.js, written in TypeScript and intended for developers building multiplayer games and real time applications such as chat and message push.

read the full pinus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Pumpkin vs Godot Pumpkin vs three.js Pumpkin vs imgui Pumpkin vs bevy Pumpkin vs raylib Pumpkin vs GDevelop Pumpkin vs Babylon.js Pumpkin vs libgdx Pumpkin vs aframe Pumpkin vs OpenRA Pumpkin vs engine Pumpkin vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is Pumpkin or pinus more popular?

Pumpkin has 11,347 GitHub stars and pinus has 1,932. Pumpkin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pumpkin and pinus free?

Both are open source. Pumpkin is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pinus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pumpkin and pinus?

Pumpkin is written in Rust and pinus in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pumpkin or pinus?

Choose Pumpkin if you want the larger community (11,347 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pinus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.