head to head · open source

engine vs Pumpkin

engine has 16,890 GitHub stars, 2,000 forks, 471 open issues and last shipped today. Pumpkin has 11,325 stars, 819 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. engine leads on adoption by 49% (16,890 vs 11,325 stars). engine is written in JavaScript under MIT; Pumpkin is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. engine has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Pumpkin 7%. engine was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

engine ★ 17K Pumpkin ★ 11K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

engine Pumpkin
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 11K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 819
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick engine if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full engine profile →

pick Pumpkin if

  • You want the Pumpkin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Pumpkin fits your workflow better

full Pumpkin profile →

About engine

PlayCanvas Engine is an open source, MIT licensed JavaScript and TypeScript runtime for building interactive 3D apps, games and visualizations that run in any browser on any device, built on WebGL2 and WebGPU.

read the full engine overview →

About Pumpkin

Pumpkin is a Minecraft server implementation written entirely in Rust that aims to let anyone host fast and efficient Java and Bedrock Edition servers, and it is built for server operators and plugin developers who want vanilla compatible gameplay without the official Java server.

read the full Pumpkin overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

engine vs Godot engine vs three.js engine vs imgui engine vs bevy engine vs raylib engine vs GDevelop engine vs Babylon.js engine vs libgdx engine vs aframe engine vs OpenRA engine vs MonoGame engine vs azerothcore-wotlk

Frequently asked questions

Is engine or Pumpkin more popular?

engine has 16,890 GitHub stars and Pumpkin has 11,325. engine has the larger community by that measure.

Are engine and Pumpkin free?

Both are open source. engine is licensed under MIT and Pumpkin under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between engine and Pumpkin?

engine is written in JavaScript and Pumpkin in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, engine or Pumpkin?

Choose engine if you want the larger community (16,890 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pumpkin if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.