head to head · open source

aframe vs Pumpkin

aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars, 4,396 forks, 338 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Pumpkin has 11,301 stars, 815 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aframe leads on adoption by 56% (17,635 vs 11,301 stars). aframe is written in JavaScript under MIT; Pumpkin is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. aframe has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, Pumpkin 7%. Pumpkin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

aframe ★ 18K Pumpkin ★ 11K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

aframe Pumpkin
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 11K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-07-13 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 815
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick aframe if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full aframe profile →

pick Pumpkin if

  • You want the Pumpkin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Pumpkin fits your workflow better

full Pumpkin profile →

About aframe

A Frame is an MIT licensed JavaScript web framework built on top of three.js that lets anyone who can write HTML build browser based 3D, augmented reality and virtual reality experiences running on desktop, mobile and any WebXR capable headset.

read the full aframe overview →

About Pumpkin

Pumpkin is a Minecraft server implementation written entirely in Rust that aims to let anyone host fast and efficient Java and Bedrock Edition servers, and it is built for server operators and plugin developers who want vanilla compatible gameplay without the official Java server.

read the full Pumpkin overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

aframe vs Godot aframe vs three.js aframe vs imgui aframe vs bevy aframe vs raylib aframe vs GDevelop aframe vs Babylon.js aframe vs libgdx aframe vs MonoGame aframe vs azerothcore-wotlk aframe vs zinx aframe vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is aframe or Pumpkin more popular?

aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars and Pumpkin has 11,301. aframe has the larger community by that measure.

Are aframe and Pumpkin free?

Both are open source. aframe is licensed under MIT and Pumpkin under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between aframe and Pumpkin?

aframe is written in JavaScript and Pumpkin in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, aframe or Pumpkin?

Choose aframe if you want the larger community (17,635 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pumpkin if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.