head to head · open source

Pumpkin vs goworld

Pumpkin has 11,325 GitHub stars, 819 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. goworld has 2,718 stars, 474 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Pumpkin leads on adoption by 317% (11,325 vs 2,718 stars). Pumpkin is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; goworld is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Pumpkin has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, goworld 17%. Pumpkin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pumpkin ★ 11K goworld ★ 2.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pumpkin goworld
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 2.7K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-22 2025-11-14
Forks ⑂ 819 ⑂ 474
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pumpkin if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pumpkin profile →

pick goworld if

  • You want the goworld feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and goworld fits your workflow better

full goworld profile →

About Pumpkin

Pumpkin is a Minecraft server implementation written entirely in Rust that aims to let anyone host fast and efficient Java and Bedrock Edition servers, and it is built for server operators and plugin developers who want vanilla compatible gameplay without the official Java server.

read the full Pumpkin overview →

About goworld

GoWorld is an Apache 2.0 licensed, scalable distributed game server engine written in Go, with hot swapping of game logic, aimed at developers and studios that run persistent multiplayer game worlds.

read the full goworld overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Pumpkin vs Godot Pumpkin vs three.js Pumpkin vs imgui Pumpkin vs bevy Pumpkin vs raylib Pumpkin vs GDevelop Pumpkin vs Babylon.js Pumpkin vs libgdx Pumpkin vs aframe Pumpkin vs OpenRA Pumpkin vs engine Pumpkin vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is Pumpkin or goworld more popular?

Pumpkin has 11,325 GitHub stars and goworld has 2,718. Pumpkin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pumpkin and goworld free?

Both are open source. Pumpkin is licensed under GPL-3.0 and goworld under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pumpkin and goworld?

Pumpkin is written in Rust and goworld in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pumpkin or goworld?

Choose Pumpkin if you want the larger community (11,325 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose goworld if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.