head to head · open source

imgui vs engine

imgui has 76,322 GitHub stars, 12,053 forks, 1,227 open issues and last shipped yesterday. engine has 16,890 stars, 2,000 forks, 471 open issues and last shipped today. imgui leads on adoption by 352% (76,322 vs 16,890 stars). imgui is written in C++ under MIT; engine is written in JavaScript under MIT. imgui has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, engine 12%. engine was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (game-development, game-engine, gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

imgui ★ 76K engine ★ 17K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

imgui engine
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 17K
License MIT MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick imgui if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full imgui profile →

pick engine if

  • You want the engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and engine fits your workflow better

full engine profile →

About imgui

Dear ImGui is a bloat free, MIT licensed graphical user interface library for C++ that outputs optimized vertex buffers for rendering inside 3D pipeline enabled applications, and it is aimed at programmers building content creation, visualization, and debug tools rather than at developers shipping consumer facing UI.

read the full imgui overview →

About engine

PlayCanvas Engine is an open source, MIT licensed JavaScript and TypeScript runtime for building interactive 3D apps, games and visualizations that run in any browser on any device, built on WebGL2 and WebGPU.

read the full engine overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

imgui vs Godot imgui vs three.js imgui vs bevy imgui vs raylib imgui vs GDevelop imgui vs Babylon.js imgui vs libgdx imgui vs aframe imgui vs OpenRA imgui vs MonoGame imgui vs Pumpkin imgui vs azerothcore-wotlk

Frequently asked questions

Is imgui or engine more popular?

imgui has 76,322 GitHub stars and engine has 16,890. imgui has the larger community by that measure.

Are imgui and engine free?

Both are open source. imgui is licensed under MIT and engine under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between imgui and engine?

imgui is written in C++ and engine in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, imgui or engine?

Choose imgui if you want the larger community (76,322 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose engine if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.