head to head · open source

OpenShot vs FableCut

OpenShot has 6,554 GitHub stars, 813 forks, 418 open issues and last shipped today. FableCut has 694 stars, 73 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. OpenShot leads on adoption by 844% (6,554 vs 694 stars). OpenShot is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; FableCut is written in JavaScript under MIT. OpenShot has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, FableCut 11%. OpenShot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ffmpeg, video-editing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenShot ★ 6.6K FableCut ★ 694 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenShot FableCut
GitHub stars ★ 6.6K ★ 694
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-28 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 813 ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenShot if

  • You weight community size — 6.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenShot profile →

pick FableCut if

  • You want the FableCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and FableCut fits your workflow better

full FableCut profile →

About OpenShot

OpenShot Video Editor is a free, cross platform, open source video editor for Linux, Mac, and Windows, built for hobbyists, educators, and small production teams who want timeline based editing and animation without a commercial subscription.

read the full OpenShot overview →

About FableCut

FableCut is a zero dependency, MIT licensed browser video editor that runs as a Premiere style non linear editor in the browser and exposes its entire timeline as a single JSON document that AI agents can edit over MCP or REST.

read the full FableCut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenShot vs OpenCut OpenShot vs LosslessCut OpenShot vs sharp OpenShot vs rembg OpenShot vs Audacity OpenShot vs filepond OpenShot vs Shotcut OpenShot vs ImageToolbox OpenShot vs palmier-pro OpenShot vs Darktable OpenShot vs libvips OpenShot vs imgproxy

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenShot or FableCut more popular?

OpenShot has 6,554 GitHub stars and FableCut has 694. OpenShot has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenShot and FableCut free?

Both are open source. OpenShot has no licence declared in this registry, and FableCut is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenShot and FableCut?

OpenShot is written in Python and FableCut in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenShot or FableCut?

Choose OpenShot if you want the larger community (6,554 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FableCut if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.