head to head · open source

OpenRA vs zinx

OpenRA has 17,408 GitHub stars, 3,048 forks, 1,598 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. zinx has 7,765 stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. OpenRA leads on adoption by 124% (17,408 vs 7,765 stars). OpenRA is written in C# under GPL-3.0; zinx is written in Go under MIT. OpenRA has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, zinx 16%. OpenRA was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenRA ★ 17K zinx ★ 7.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenRA zinx
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 7.8K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in C# Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-06-06
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenRA if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenRA profile →

pick zinx if

  • You want the zinx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and zinx fits your workflow better

full zinx profile →

About OpenRA

OpenRA is a libre, free and open source real time strategy game engine written in C with SDL and OpenGL, built for players, mappers and modders who want to run and extend early Westwood classics such as Command & Conquer: Red Alert, Command & Conquer: Tiberian Dawn and Dune 2000 on Windows, Linux, BSD and Mac OS X.

read the full OpenRA overview →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

OpenRA vs Godot OpenRA vs three.js OpenRA vs imgui OpenRA vs bevy OpenRA vs raylib OpenRA vs GDevelop OpenRA vs Babylon.js OpenRA vs libgdx OpenRA vs aframe OpenRA vs MonoGame OpenRA vs Pumpkin OpenRA vs azerothcore-wotlk

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenRA or zinx more popular?

OpenRA has 17,408 GitHub stars and zinx has 7,765. OpenRA has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenRA and zinx free?

Both are open source. OpenRA is licensed under GPL-3.0 and zinx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenRA and zinx?

OpenRA is written in C# and zinx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenRA or zinx?

Choose OpenRA if you want the larger community (17,408 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose zinx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.