head to head · open source

OpenCut vs openseo

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars, 8,852 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. openseo has 19,046 stars, 2,447 forks, 161 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 371% (89,680 vs 19,046 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; openseo is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, openseo 13%. openseo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K openseo ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut openseo
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 19K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick openseo if

  • You want the openseo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openseo fits your workflow better

full openseo profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About openseo

OpenSEO is an open source SEO tool written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It is an alternative to paid SEO platforms such as Semrush and Ahrefs, and it lives in the open source SEO tooling ecosystem. The project provides a hosted option, self hosting paths, and an MCP server for agent use.

read the full openseo overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs openseo opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs OpenShot OpenCut vs GIMP OpenCut vs Kdenlive OpenCut vs RawTherapee

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or openseo more popular?

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars and openseo has 19,046. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and openseo free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and openseo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and openseo?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and openseo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or openseo?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,680 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openseo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.