head to head · open source

OpenCut vs google-images-download

OpenCut has 90,465 GitHub stars, 8,941 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. google-images-download has 8,685 stars, 2,083 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 942% (90,465 vs 8,685 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; google-images-download is written in Python under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, google-images-download 24%. OpenCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K google-images-download ★ 8.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut google-images-download
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 8.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-05-18
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick google-images-download if

  • You want the google-images-download feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and google-images-download fits your workflow better

full google-images-download profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About google-images-download

google images download is a ready to run Python command line script that searches Google Images and downloads hundreds of images to a local hard drive, for anyone who needs a large image collection on disk without saving each picture by hand.

read the full google-images-download overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or google-images-download more popular?

OpenCut has 90,465 GitHub stars and google-images-download has 8,685. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and google-images-download free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and google-images-download under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and google-images-download?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and google-images-download in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or google-images-download?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,465 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose google-images-download if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.