head to head · open source
open-multi-agent vs Logfire
open-multi-agent has 7,045 GitHub stars, 2,440 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Logfire has 4,533 stars, 351 forks, 191 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-multi-agent leads on adoption by 55% (7,045 vs 4,533 stars). open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; Logfire is written in Python under MIT. open-multi-agent has attracted 35% as many forks as stars, Logfire 8%. Logfire was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-multi-agent | Logfire | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.0K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 351 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-multi-agent if
- You weight community size — 7.0K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Logfire if
- You want the Logfire feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Logfire fits your workflow better
About open-multi-agent
OMA Agents your organization can own, approve, and audit. OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime: consequential actions wait for durable, tamper evident approvals, and every run leaves a record you can verify offline, byte for byte. Website · Docs · Examples · npm English · 中文 No telemetry. No hosted control plane. Your keys, your models — cloud, local (Ollama, vLLM, llama server), or Chinese providers — your environment. Nothing stops working when the people who built it leave. Get started Requires Node.js 20 or newer. For production, use a currently maintained Node.js LTS release…
read the full open-multi-agent overview →
About Logfire
Pydantic Logfire: Know more. Build faster. From the team behind Pydantic Validation, Pydantic Logfire is an observability platform built on the same belief as our open source library: that the most powerful tools can be easy to use. What sets Logfire apart: Simple and Powerful: Logfire's dashboard is simple relative to the power it provides, ensuring your entire engineering team will actually use it. Python centric Insights: From rich display of Python objects, to event loop telemetry, to profiling Python code and database queries, Logfire gives you unparalleled visibility into your Python application's…
read the full Logfire overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-multi-agent or Logfire more popular?
open-multi-agent has 7,045 GitHub stars and Logfire has 4,533. open-multi-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-multi-agent and Logfire free?
Both are open source. open-multi-agent is licensed under MIT and Logfire under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-multi-agent and Logfire?
open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript and Logfire in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-multi-agent or Logfire?
Choose open-multi-agent if you want the larger community (7,045 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Logfire if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.