head to head · open source

Grafana vs open-multi-agent

Grafana has 76,813 GitHub stars, 14,758 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 1,006% (76,813 vs 6,943 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 6.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or open-multi-agent more popular?

Grafana has 76,813 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and open-multi-agent?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or open-multi-agent?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,813 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.