head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs open-multi-agent
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars, 8,441 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,219% (91,578 vs 6,943 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | open-multi-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 6.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-multi-agent if
- You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About open-multi-agent
OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.
read the full open-multi-agent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or open-multi-agent more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and open-multi-agent free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and open-multi-agent?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or open-multi-agent?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.