head to head · open source

huginn vs open-multi-agent

huginn has 49,976 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 620% (49,976 vs 6,943 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

huginn ★ 50K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

huginn open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 6.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Ruby TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.3K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick huginn if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full huginn profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About huginn

Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.

read the full huginn overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

huginn vs Uptime Kuma huginn vs worldmonitor huginn vs NetData huginn vs Grafana huginn vs Sentry huginn vs SigNoz huginn vs Grafana Loki huginn vs beszel huginn vs cilium huginn vs Apache SkyWalking huginn vs jaeger huginn vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is huginn or open-multi-agent more popular?

huginn has 49,976 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. huginn has the larger community by that measure.

Are huginn and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between huginn and open-multi-agent?

huginn is written in Ruby and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, huginn or open-multi-agent?

Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,976 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.