head to head · open source

NetData vs open-multi-agent

NetData has 80,598 GitHub stars, 6,631 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 1,061% (80,598 vs 6,943 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 6.9K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or open-multi-agent more popular?

NetData has 80,598 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and open-multi-agent?

NetData is written in Go and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or open-multi-agent?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,598 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.