head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs open-multi-agent

worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars, 13,211 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped today. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,154% (87,032 vs 6,943 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 6.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or open-multi-agent more popular?

worldmonitor has 87,032 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and open-multi-agent?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or open-multi-agent?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (87,032 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.