head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs open-multi-agent

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars, 4,115 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-multi-agent has 6,943 stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 316% (28,917 vs 6,943 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki open-multi-agent
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 6.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better

full open-multi-agent profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or open-multi-agent more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 6,943. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and open-multi-agent free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and open-multi-agent?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or open-multi-agent?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,917 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.