head to head · open source
Grafana Loki vs open-multi-agent
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars, 4,173 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-multi-agent has 7,045 stars, 2,440 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 313% (29,120 vs 7,045 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana Loki | open-multi-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 7.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana Loki if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-multi-agent if
- You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better
About Grafana Loki
Loki: like Prometheus, but for logs. Loki is a horizontally scalable, highly available, multi tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate. It does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream. Compared to other log aggregation systems, Loki: does not do full text indexing on logs. By storing compressed, unstructured logs and only indexing metadata, Loki is simpler to operate and cheaper to run. indexes and groups log streams using the same labels you’re already using with Prometheus, enabling you to…
read the full Grafana Loki overview →
About open-multi-agent
OMA Agents your organization can own, approve, and audit. OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime: consequential actions wait for durable, tamper evident approvals, and every run leaves a record you can verify offline, byte for byte. Website · Docs · Examples · npm English · 中文 No telemetry. No hosted control plane. Your keys, your models — cloud, local (Ollama, vLLM, llama server), or Chinese providers — your environment. Nothing stops working when the people who built it leave. Get started Requires Node.js 20 or newer. For production, use a currently maintained Node.js LTS release…
read the full open-multi-agent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Loki or open-multi-agent more popular?
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 7,045. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana Loki and open-multi-agent free?
Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana Loki and open-multi-agent?
Grafana Loki is written in Go and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or open-multi-agent?
Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (29,120 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.