head to head · open source

Nuclear vs BookWyrm

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. BookWyrm has 2,780 stars, 338 forks, 418 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Nuclear leads on adoption by 565% (18,480 vs 2,780 stars). Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; BookWyrm is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. Nuclear has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, BookWyrm 12%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nuclear ★ 18K BookWyrm ★ 2.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nuclear BookWyrm
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 2.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 338
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nuclear if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nuclear profile →

pick BookWyrm if

  • You want the BookWyrm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and BookWyrm fits your workflow better

full BookWyrm profile →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

About BookWyrm

BookWyrm is a social reading network for tracking books, writing reviews, and discovering what to read next. It lives in the ActivityPub ecosystem, so users can interact with other BookWyrm instances and with ActivityPub services such as Mastodon and Pleroma. The project is a Python web application using Django, PostgreSQL, Redis, Celery, and ActivityPub.

read the full BookWyrm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Nuclear vs Jellyfin Nuclear vs Invidious Nuclear vs Navidrome Nuclear vs neko Nuclear vs Kodi Nuclear vs PeerTube Nuclear vs iptv-sources Nuclear vs ansible-nas Nuclear vs Anthias Nuclear vs tvheadend Nuclear vs Ghosten-Player Nuclear vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Nuclear or BookWyrm more popular?

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars and BookWyrm has 2,780. Nuclear has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nuclear and BookWyrm free?

Both are open source. Nuclear is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and BookWyrm has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Nuclear and BookWyrm?

Nuclear is written in TypeScript and BookWyrm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nuclear or BookWyrm?

Choose Nuclear if you want the larger community (18,480 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose BookWyrm if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.